A Comparative Study: Cognition Vs Prolific Online Platform


Nowadays, researchers have various tools at their disposal when it comes to running online experiments. Let’s delve into the characteristics of two such platforms, Cognition and the Prolific Online Platform, and compare them on various aspects like cost, learning curve, flexibility, and community.

Cost Comparison

Undoubtedly, cost always plays a significant role in decision making. In comparison to Prolific, Cognition has been regarded as a more affordable tool for running behavioral and cognitive experiments online.

Learning Curve Comparison

Cognition implements JsPsych, a legitimate and uncomplicated JavaScript library for running behavioral experiments on a web browser. On the other hand, achieving fluency with the Prolific Online Platform requires learning and navigating through its unique interface which is not as straightforward as one would hope.

Flexibility Comparison

Cognition presents a selection of cognitive tasks and flexible design templates which allows researchers to sculpt their psychological research. This advantage provides increased flexibility in comparison to Prolific's more rigid structure.

Community Comparison

Cognition backs its users with a pleasing community. It's full of researchers willing to share their knowledge and experience, fostering collaboration. As for Prolific, it is comparative in its community efforts, yet Cognition takes the lead in this regard due to its collaborative spirit wrapped around the notion of shared learning.

In conclusion, both Cognition and Prolific Online Platform are viable options for running online studies, but based on cost, learning curve, flexibility, and community, Cognition offers a relatively greater advantage. Not only can it assist in running experiments more affordably and effortlessly, but it also promotes collaboration and shared learning within the researcher community.

Related articles: